"Surely there were differences between them, but to watch the debate was to see two candidates vying to say who would cut taxes the least for top earners, who would “crack down” most on China, and who believed the most in an “all of the above” energy strategy. Neither said much of import, if at all, each candidate won certain segments, but the impossible to escape conclusion was just how unimpressive both candidates were."
John Tamny | Forbes: Romney v. Obama Was a Nauseating Draw, and Both Deserve to Lose
He raises good points on the energy policies and subtler claims as with endorsement of the Pell Grant.
This post has 4 notes.
- moralesja likes this
- khilire likes this
- larakat likes this
- thepeacefulterrorist likes this
- roxygen posted this